Between Diana Edulji and Vinod Rai, there has been a war of words between the Cricketers' Committee of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). His statement about the inquiry of KL Rahul and Hardik Pandya has now passed that the BCCI members have called a special general meeting (SGM) to appoint a Lokpal because primarily Edulji and Roy are on the same page. Refuse to be. SGM is believed that Diana Edulji is questioning the partial dependence of Vinod Rai on the new BCCI constitution. However, Rai told Diana Edulji in an e-mail, which was specifically accessed by NDTV, has made herself clear that she does not want to participate in any proceeding against the order of the Supreme Court . SGM meeting is to be held on 17th January.
"In my view, the COA is bound to comply with the new constitution and the suggestions you are giving are not in accordance with the Constitution nor it is in accordance with the legal advice. It can not be a case that we only have legal advice Please consider, "proper". I can not be a party for this decision and process. In the circumstances, please proceed with your suggestions. Please check the AS and acting secretary. That can not be the party for such a decision.In the investigation, I will not go against the Supreme Court's directions / constitution. Please also note that since you do not follow the suggestion of the 'ad hoc ombudsman' Your suggestion reduces the risk of your committee & # 39; Judge, Jury & # 39; Hangman & # 39; Please proceed and take it forward. I will keep it away and leave it to you. , "Wrote Rai.
Responding to Rai's mail, Edulji wrote, "COA can not be bound in the selected cases and this is what I am highlighting through all, that we must work at all times according to the rules and regulations of the new constitution. Your point is not to go against the directive / constitution of the Supreme Court, I warn you the same time and again, as you have directed the Supreme Court directive / Has worked against the Constitution, where a committee was appointed despite the CAC and in the matter of sexual harassment of Rahul Jeweler, you appointed a one-sided independent committee which is not according to constitution and I have also Your opinion about the judge, the jury and the executor of your committee is exactly what you want, in the pursuit and sexual harassment case, whom I had opposed and you decided to unilaterally. My point of keeping a legal view of the players was only to make an informed and correct decision. As per the new constitution there is no provision for the appointment of ad hoc ombudsman, therefore We can not move forward with it. As the scheduled caste hearing is scheduled for January 17, the court should be informed about this situation and a Lokpal should be appointed rather than that, he should take the wrong action of the appointment of the ad hoc ombudsman, which according to the new constitution Not there. "
Earlier on Saturday, Diana Edulji had warned Vinod Rai of any "cover up" in the interrogation. Apart from this, Edulji also has expressed objection to BCCI CEO Rahul Johri for initial scrutiny of the matter.
In Edulji's e-mail, accessed by the Times of India, who was in response to the match of Vinod Rai's expedition, it was mentioned that if Rahul Jewelers perform preliminary investigations then the CoA can be criticized , Because they are on their own end of "serious sexual charges". Edulji further said that any early quick cover-up job will be seen as a job. He said that the COA should be questioned by three BCCI officials.
(With the input of Rica Roy)